News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sam Altman didn’t take any equity in OpenAI, report says by marcusverus on Friday March 24, 2023 @11:37PM (#35299056)
Why do progressives always resort to oblique arguments like this? Are you capable of engaging without resorting to innuendo or broad accusations of bad faith?
Re:Sam Altman didn’t take any equity in OpenAI, report says by SideQuark on Saturday March 25, 2023 @12:56AM (#35299581)
I'm not a progressive. Why do people immediately label others to fit strawmen arguments?

Let's break down the statements:

Is there a movement or group often labeled alt-right?

If so, do they use that phrase to label themselves?

Do they tend to have similar beliefs (say for example support police, nearly unlimited free speech rights, smaller govt, lower spending...)?

When these beliefs are not convenient, do they ignore them? (Ignore police and law for Jan 6, use govt to ban speech and books they dislike, increase govt intrusion for things they like, and ignore their own party running up national debt beyond anyone before Trump),?

I'm pretty sure the above facts are not political at all. They are facts. The hypocrisy has pushed a significant number of lifelong conservatives out of the party. It would be a magical progressive that could simply argue so many conservatives to bail out.

Re:Sam Altman didn’t take any equity in OpenAI, report says by marcusverus on Sunday March 26, 2023 @04:54PM (#35319478)
To reiterate:

> Why do progressives always resort to oblique arguments like this?

None of this has anything to do with whether Elon is supposedly making alt-right OpenAI, or whether Elon is himself alt-right. The only thing you've accomplished is to reveal that you don't know what "alt-right" means.