Is this a reference to Cambridge Analytica? Their electoral effects were mostly dismissed.
Functionally they were used for five things:
1. Political advertising, which is what all campaigns engage in.
2. Discussions of the election by our own citizens, sometimes critical, more often an echo chamber or virtual throat stabbing contest.
3. News about the election which is free name recognition for all of the candidates the media considers worth talking about.
4. Market research by the campaigns.
5. A platform for foreign propaganda including psy-ops, which is bad and should be addressed, but not even close to bad enough to effect the outcome of an election as much as many might want to think that it did.
You can’t really pin the 2016 election on Facebook specifically since any information on there competes with any information not from there and there was a lot more not-Facebook information involved in that election, but Facebook by that point made for a nice scapegoat that nobody has any real sympathy for. Remember too that it was real Americans that actually filled in their ballots that decided the election for every single candidate on the list.
no, you are being set up to hate China for mostly no reason (well, there is a good reason...Taiwan needs US aircraft carriers and air power)
we saw this in 2002 running up to Iraq..it was crazy how many Americans all of a sudden were in a lather over Saddam Hussein...it was all programmed by the media. everyone now likes to talk about how it was a terrible decision...guess what, in 2002 pretty much everyone was enthusiastically on board (as instructed!)
I'm certainly no fan of the PRC but there is a huge difference between disdain and a willingness to engage in a war the US and Taiwan might very well lose (badly) with Americans dying
or are we just going to be at war forever?
Based on Russia's performance in Ukraine and China's military might seemingly less than Russia's I doubt the US Navy has a tough time keeping China out of Taiwan, let alone the entire military might of the US
and btw if you are going to go look at casualty counts, don't bother, its well understood that the Chinese lost ten men for every US soldier killed...they still won
In the years since the gulf between capabilities has grown, and especially seeing how Russia can't crush Ukraine using castoff NATO gear China will be wise to not poke the bear.
mmm, no. In 2002 "everyone" pretty much agreed that invading Iraq was a bad idea. People only went along with it after it happened to "show support for the troops." Or have you forgotten the "Hate Bush, love the troops" bumper stickers?
Americans are all retreating into paranoid fantasies.
But that doesn't make trying to ban or force the sale of tiktok anything more than a depressing/transparent sinophobic propoganda exercise.
I'm confused, I'm supposed to hate China but...also do business there?
can you point me at a trade agreement that requires China to allow unlimited access to American companies?
I really hope all the China hawks here go enlist...its the perfect time, with tech laying off and the military far short of recruitment goals...don't go ask other people to die for your upvotes
They limit the types of U.S. businesses that can operate in China and it it’s not unreasonable that we respond in kind.