Re:ChatGPT Plugins
by marban on Thursday March 23, 2023 @01:14PM
(#35277957)
Smart way to remain the funnel owner. Let everyone build a plugin, before they integrate your product into theirs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:ChatGPT Plugins
by fdgsdfogijq on Thursday March 23, 2023 @01:16PM
(#35277981)
OpenAI is crushing it in terms of product strategy
Well, of course.
They are led by GPT4 and their CEO is just a Text To Speech Interface ;-)
Embedding to Speech interface ;-)
Re:ChatGPT Plugins
by ignoramous on Thursday March 23, 2023 @01:55PM
(#35278677)
It's in the surname: alt man.
Secret Messages
They have a window of less than 6 month to create a monopoly before their tech get commoditized.
The play is well know: create a marketplace with customers and vendors like Amazon, Facebook, Google.
But with GPT-4 training finished last summer they had plenty of time for strategy.
Yeah. I really underestimated OpenAI's ability to productize ChatGPT.
> their tech get commoditized
that's if competitors catch up on quality
Well that’s a win-win situation
Let insiders & preferred users build a plugin, then, slowly, everyone else on the waitlist
...And approve 1% of them.
it's dark..
I m hoping chatbots will end up small enough they can run locally, everywhere. This is a lot of private data.
It may be doable - a chatbot with a lot of plugins does not need to know a lot of facts, just to have a good grasp of language. It can fetch its factual answers from the wikipedia plugin
Re:ChatGPT Plugins
by wahnfrieden on Thursday March 23, 2023 @05:08PM
(#35281294)
openai wants to gatekeep access and use of their AI. so why would they ever release a local LLM? i think that would come from their enemies
they wouldn't ; i hope there will be an open source alternative. Firefox and chrome are open source
I mean, GPT3 requires some 800GB of memory to run, do we all have gazillion dollars supercomputers at home?
I think, unless there's some real breaktrough in the field or in the hw acceleration, this kind of model is going to stay locked behind a pricy API for quite some time.
GPT-3.5 requires less. And neither model is considered size-optimal. It's just that with Microsoft's money, it's easier for OpenAI to move fast by throwing said money at more hardware rather than trying to optimize for size.
And yeah, I wouldn't expect them to share any model that is competitive with their current offering. But it can leak, and the copyright situation around that is very unclear at the moment.