Re:OpenAI’s policies hinder reproducible research on languag...
by mcaledonensis on Thursday March 23, 2023 @01:40AM
(#35270859)
It's not like what OpenAI did was an impossible magic trick. They've had exactly three insights. And a right team composition. Repeat that, you'll have GPT 4. You will not have GPT 5 though ;)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OpenAI’s policies hinder reproducible research on languag...
by jiggywiggy on Thursday March 23, 2023 @03:57AM
(#35271666)
Its not interesting. It's a hack to have a don't be evil vibe and keeping the name "open" while they go against their own foundational principles.
Re:OpenAI’s policies hinder reproducible research on languag...
by KyeRussell on Thursday March 23, 2023 @05:39AM
(#35272218)
You aren’t providing any sort of valuable insight here. This is more indicative of your priors than anything else. Everyone has heard this argument. The people that believe it, believe it. The people that don’t, don’t.
Re:OpenAI’s policies hinder reproducible research on languag...
by jiggywiggy on Sunday March 26, 2023 @12:26PM
(#35316272)
The initial goal was to make ai available to everyone. In the process of getting enough funds to build their vision they gave it to Microsoft.
Re:OpenAI’s policies hinder reproducible research on languag...
by whym on Thursday March 23, 2023 @04:00AM
(#35271679)
From WordNet:
> 1. skittish, flighty, spooky, nervous -- (unpredictably excitable (especially of horses))
(I didn't know the word skittish, and I figured this might help others, too.)
Re:OpenAI’s policies hinder reproducible research on languag...
by selfhoster11 on Thursday March 23, 2023 @08:14AM
(#35273505)
Lots of people complain about Apple being skittish (including HN comment section), but they also expect them to pull a stunt every once in a while. OpenAI was an unknown quantity until now.