News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MRSK vs. Fly.io by debarshri on Thursday March 23, 2023 @12:30AM (#35270559)
I have a hypothesis around why people think it is complex. In my opinion it is not very complex, But the way of working, interfaces that developers deal with and formal process around k8s creates a perception that it is complex. It is also all the tools around k8s that makes it feel complex. You don't need istio, kyverno, OPA, all the other million tools from the cncf landscape to deploy your simple rails app. The industry had to paint that operating k8s hard so that they could sell tools around it. Currently version of k8s and all the stripped down versions are much easier to operate than before.

It barely takes a weekend to learn and play around with managed k8s from cloud providers or with minified k8s tools like k3s, k0s etc.

Re:MRSK vs. Fly.io by nicoburns on Thursday March 23, 2023 @08:39AM (#35273777)
I think it's fair to say that it's considerably more complex than a single (or say 2-3) linux VMs. I can see that managed kubernetes would make things simpler. But managed kubernetes is also just as expensive as other managed solutions (more expensive for small projects).
Re:MRSK vs. Fly.io by selcuka on Thursday March 23, 2023 @09:47PM (#35284036)
I'm not a customer, but Vultr offers a free control plane [1] unlike other managed k8s providers. You only pay for the nodes you use.

[1] https://www.vultr.com/kubernetes/