Re:Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought
by psychlops on Tuesday March 21, 2023 @08:36AM
(#35245328)
Hah! I used to embed invisible pixels for our marketing department decades ago.
Re:Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought
by dylan604 on Tuesday March 21, 2023 @11:01AM
(#35247190)
This should automatically qualify one to lose their internet privileges. Not just the fact that you did it, but your cavalier attitude towards it with the lack of regret for having done it
Re:Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought
by psychlops on Tuesday March 21, 2023 @03:15PM
(#35251083)
I actually agree with you. However, I plead that it was novel at the time, used ineffectively by a tiny marketing department, and not anywhere near this spy level capacity achieved today.
Re:Web fingerprinting is worse than I thought
by kuschku on Wednesday March 22, 2023 @04:15AM
(#35258194)
With that method, you won't be able to distinguish between the many different devices using the same browser at same resolution behind one IP.
In the era of CGNAT that means you now only know which city I'm from and whether I use Chrome or Firefox. People mostly use browsers in maximized and resolutions are relatively standardized nowadays.
Compared to the data you get from canvas and webgl, that's much less unique.
That's adorable. I guess you're not old enough to remember when we used to track people with things like invisible pixels. Or todays equivalent: testing CSS parameters.
Neither require JavaScript, and there are a hundred other non-JavaScript methods.