Do you have a citation for that?

would be interested in that as well

Could you expand on this a bit more? What types of prompts? What are your evaluation criteria?

This actually sounds fascinating. Not unlike birdwatching! ))

We need open benchmarks, clearly. Know any projects in that space?

That’s interesting - what about 4?

What kind of things have you seen davinci-003 do better than 3.5 turbo?

That's quite a confusing comment. `davinci-003` is from OpenAI, whereas ChatGPT is some sort of variants more "optimized" for chatting. Said differently, GPT3 or 3.5 is a customized version of `davinci-003`, made for chatting. Please don't ask me on the details, I don't know, but `davinci-003` is not an alternative to ChatGPT

It is an alternative. It’s just more expensive.

>but `davinci-003` is not an alternative to ChatGPT

Why makes you believe that? In my testing davinci does better than gpt-3.5-turbo for most tasks.

I think people, and this article, is about suggesting alternatives (competitors) to ChatGPT. `davinci` is obviously not an alternative, ChatGPT is `davinci` made for chatting. As to whether davinci produces better responses than ChatGPT ... maybe? but that's a different question