Re:Apology to 37signals
by ktsmith on Saturday January 28, 2012 @06:14PM
(#3523690)
You realize there's two parts to the oatmeal response right? It also includes strong language. For example: "To the users of FunnyJunk: I never had plans to sue FunnyJunk and get it shut down; I just wanted my stolen comics removed -- your admin is a moron who chooses his words about as carefully as a mule chooses where to take a shit."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apology to 37signals
by wormwood28 on Saturday January 28, 2012 @07:41PM
(#3523948)
Anyone who has seen the wrath poured out on people who dislike (or disagree with) the oatmeal on its facebook page has to laugh a bit when the creator -- I forget his name -- is held up as a model of level-headed behavior.
Re:Apology to 37signals
by arguesalot on Tuesday February 07, 2012 @02:32PM
(#3563328)
you realize that was 1 year after the situation started and after he contacted the funnyjunk staff
Re:Apology to 37signals
by LearnYouALisp on Saturday January 28, 2012 @11:17PM
(#3524416)
That wasn't even poor choice of words, he deliberately tried to instigate a riot and sensationalized the response.
I agree actually, I was just pointing out that it was a bit hypocritical to hold up the oatmeal as a good example of responding to being ripped off. I'm not particularly offended by the response of DHH to curebits either.
Re:Apology to 37signals
by LearnYouALisp on Sunday January 29, 2012 @04:15PM
(#3526283)
Yeah, I meant what he said in the quote--I don't know if he should have said anything more, but it certainly seems far from a mere "poor choice of words".