News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court Asked to Strike Down Immunity for Police Wh... by mfer on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:43PM (#35234353)
As a friendly reminder, the legislature crafts the laws while the courts judge if they are followed or not.

There is a definite place for the legislature to step in and be clear here.

Re:Supreme Court Asked to Strike Down Immunity for Police Wh... by dwallin on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:48PM (#35234472)
To be clear, qualified immunity is entirely a judicial branch legal principle, and not a law that was passed by the legislative branch.
Re:Supreme Court Asked to Strike Down Immunity for Police Wh... by mfer on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:51PM (#35234515)
If laws are created in this space than the judicial legal principle MUST to be reworked/updated/changed to accommodate it. The law is a higher priority.
Re:Supreme Court Asked to Strike Down Immunity for Police Wh... by dwallin on Monday March 20, 2023 @01:39PM (#35235418)
There IS a law (Section 1983), which stood whole for almost a century, before the Supreme Court largely gutted by inventing this legal principal out of thin air.
Re:Supreme Court Asked to Strike Down Immunity for Police Wh... by giantg2 on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:48PM (#35234468)
"while the courts judge if they are followed or not."

Or in the case of qualified immunity, create it out of thin air.

Re:Supreme Court Asked to Strike Down Immunity for Police Wh... by mfer on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:53PM (#35234565)
It's not created out of thin air. There is a lot of reasoning and background on it. Whether I agree with it or like it is entirely different.
Re:Supreme Court Asked to Strike Down Immunity for Police Wh... by giantg2 on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:55PM (#35234612)
Is there a law granting this power? No. It was created by the court.

I can reason about something all I want, but it doesn't make it the law.