Re:The Unpredictable Abilities Emerging from Large AI Models
by WalterBright on Friday March 17, 2023 @01:02PM
(#35199802)
Doing a table lookup for common cases and computing for the less common ones is perfectly valid!
Re:The Unpredictable Abilities Emerging from Large AI Models
by Jeff_Brown on Friday March 17, 2023 @01:26PM
(#35200103)
And for some problems it's even efficient. Not factorial, though.
Re:The Unpredictable Abilities Emerging from Large AI Models
by Jeff_Brown on Friday March 17, 2023 @05:30PM
(#35203173)
Oh you're right, hive mind, it's efficient. Sorry.
Re:The Unpredictable Abilities Emerging from Large AI Models
by dxbydt on Friday March 17, 2023 @01:48PM
(#35200372)
Not 100% sure but I believe this is how we landed the lunar module on the moon the first time...tan/arctan/both were too hard to compute on the processors of those days so they discretized into half angles & stored the tangents in a lookup table.
Re:The Unpredictable Abilities Emerging from Large AI Models
by hgsgm on Friday March 17, 2023 @04:56PM
(#35202795)
That's how early calculators worked, and some fast math libraries today too.
Re:The Unpredictable Abilities Emerging from Large AI Models
by speed_spread on Friday March 17, 2023 @09:12PM
(#35205017)
The Pentium FDIV bug was due to a bad value in a lookup table.
For shits and giggles, I just just wrote a series of `if...then` statements for 0 to 5, and only actually calculated the factorial for inputs >=6. I passed after the examiner just input 3 and 5 and was satisfied that the output was correct. Oops.