An acquaintance had a theory, though. They presumed that Apple was doing two years of regression testing on Ventura, so maybe they grabbed the latest version at the time, tested stuff for two years and shipped the version they tested.
If so, I don't blame them. Most protects are not run like mine, so they need to test for the lowest common denominator and assume that later versions will have new bugs.
Also, I noticed they've been technically in violation of the GPL for years with bash - they never shipped source for rootless.h/etc
I really should rewrite this but it was written many years ago and grew into something more than I originally intended. Plus, it works.
Not at all! My software is built to serve. I'm simply delighted that people have use for it.
I know about one user that uses it for their finances. While that's terrifying for me, it should technically be safe, as long as they don't divide.
And really, your use is an awesome use! And it didn't terrify me.
Not to mention the screenshot tool (including Command-Shift-4, Spacebar) which works immediately upon keypress unlike the new Windows built-in screenshotter. Which also doesn't hide its UI properly and may leave a small 1-pixel bar at the top of your screenshot! It's insane how poorly crafted Windows is, and yet it flourishes.
[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/bc/manual/html_mono/bc.html
bc is a little less known, though.
Four or five weeks ago, I was searching GitHub for every instance of my email for legal reasons. I came across it in an Apple OSS Distribution. And that is when I learned that my best project had been silently shipped with Ventura.
I was ecstatic! [1] It's always great to see more people adopt your work.
Don't worry; they followed the license.
[1]: https://gavinhoward.com/2023/02/my-code-conquered-another-os...