News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Docker Apology. Parent comment

Re:Docker Apology by gpm on Thursday March 16, 2023 @04:55PM (#35188460)
Someone on lobste.rs mentioned quay.io (maintained by redhat) as an alternative to dockerhub. Anyone have any experience with it?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Docker Apology by sofixa on Thursday March 16, 2023 @05:13PM (#35188740)
It started as a CoreOS project and for a long time it was the only ebterprisey registry, and it included security scanning. Had some availability issues some time ago, but AFAIK today it's pretty good.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Docker Apology by bravetraveler on Thursday March 16, 2023 @06:00PM (#35189382)
The software is nice, if looking to run your own - I'd recommend it over the typical Docker-provided incantation

Way more enterprise appropriate, for example - granular control on caches

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Docker Apology by bigiain on Thursday March 16, 2023 @10:49PM (#35192323)
Given the CentOS shit, I'm not convinced jumping from Docker Inc to RedHat is appropriately mitigating the risk of a corporate rug pull once they've decided its time for the next step in their enshittification plan...
[ Parent | on HN ]