Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by lostlogin on Thursday March 16, 2023 @11:05AM
(#35182896)
You can do it in a VM just fine too.
There is usually someone who’ll point out that this probably violates licensing, and it probably does if you do it on non-Apple hardware.
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by sangnoir on Thursday March 16, 2023 @01:56PM
(#35185618)
I have an older Mac model I use as a linux box: you just reminded me I install a Mac OS VM without violating the license - thanks!
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by duffyjp on Friday March 17, 2023 @11:43AM
(#35198556)
I was actually running ESXi on my Mini for a while and successfully installed macOS in a VM on it. The performance was horrendous though, so much of macOS depends on GPU acceleration which I didn't get. I think I've read newer macOS builds don't even have a software video fallback, though that might just be the Apple Silicon builds which wouldn't apply to me.
It was definitely a fun project even if not terribly useful.
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by TrueGeek on Thursday March 16, 2023 @12:39PM
(#35184431)
I've been using Windows iCloud client to backup to a VPS. It works okay for files, but for photos it pegged disk usage even when there weren't any new photos to download and my VPS provider wasn't happy. So far my solution is Windows iCloud client for files, and then OneDrive on my iPhone for photo backup, with OneDrive again on the VPS.
I like how the backup is outside my house, but I'm about to add Yubikey to my iCloud account and I'm not sure the Windows iCloud client is going to like that.
Now I just don't backup my iCloud, though I do remove everything older than one year every new years to my home server which follows a good 3-2-1 backup strategy.
TL;DR: If you go this route, try to get a Mac Mini that can run a supported macOS for some time to come.