We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training data

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by 8organicbits on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @02:43AM (#35164728)

At one extreme you have Disney corp squeezing money out of copyrighted material they created/bought/licensed. On the other extreme, without any copyright, you have Disney corp squeezing money out of any material they can find. Copyright is a moat that works both ways. Without copyright, profit from art goes to the most efficient t-shirt screen printer.

What's the happy middle ground?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by deadbeeves on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @02:57AM (#35164813)

Why a middle ground, though?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by account42 on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @07:53AM (#35166826)

> On the other extreme, without any copyright, you have Disney corp squeezing money out of any material they can find.

Of course they will. But so can others. Without copyright Disney won't have a legally enforced monopoly.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by dTal on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @08:48AM (#35167472)

Be careful what you optimize for. Clearly the thing you actually object to is Disney squeezing money out of things. Maybe just make that part illegal, and forget the copyright?

[ Parent | on HN ]