News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT-4 by mr_toad on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @12:40AM (#35163950)
Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder.

- Carl Sagan

Re:GPT-4 by oska on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @04:32AM (#35165417)
Schrödinger was a real and very eminent scientist, one who has staked their place in the history of science.

Sagan, while he did a little bit of useful work on planetary science early in his career, quickly descended into the realm of (self-promotional) pseudo-science. This was his fanciful search for 'extra-terrestrial intelligence'. So it's apposite that you bring him up (even if the quote you bring is a big miss against a philosophical statement), because his belief in such an 'ET' intelligence was a fantasy as much as the belief in the possibility of creating an artificial intelligence is.

Re:GPT-4 by kaba0 on Monday March 20, 2023 @06:32AM (#35229612)
While I do hold that Schrödinger was a giant of his field, let’s not forget about the Nobel disease. Blind appeal to authority does no good.
Re:GPT-4 by dalmo3 on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @06:09AM (#35165982)
Then it's also worthless to say that consciousness arise from physics.

We don't know if physics is the fundamental substrate of being, and given Agrippa's trillemma we can't know.