Oxide pays all employees $191,227 (Bay Area startup)

Re:Oxide pays all employees $191,227 (Bay Area startup) by ivraatiems on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @07:52PM (#35161386)

Except that undermines some of the core points of the letter. They talk about transparency, but are still being quite opaque. They talk about teamwork, but as employee 50, how am I supposed to feel like I'm on the same team as employee 10, when he stands to make several times more than I do if we succeed?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oxide pays all employees $191,227 (Bay Area startup) by wmf on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @07:59PM (#35161465)

Isn't this the case in every startup?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oxide pays all employees $191,227 (Bay Area startup) by jedberg on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @08:11PM (#35161643)

No. Key late hires will often get more equity than long time junior employees.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oxide pays all employees $191,227 (Bay Area startup) by sidlls on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @08:10PM (#35161629)

Yes, but it's rare that employee 10 contributes to the success of a company that has a huge liquidity event at the same multiple as his or her equity multiple as compared with employee 50.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oxide pays all employees $191,227 (Bay Area startup) by epolanski on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @08:50PM (#35162088)

As employee 10 why would I have to take more risks, put hard work if I m going to make as employee 1000 who did little?

Anyway, the beauty of such transparency is that you can decide whether it is fair for you or not.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oxide pays all employees $191,227 (Bay Area startup) by malborodog on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @02:37AM (#35164686)

Presumably then you'd have the opportunity to swap some of that comp for equity (buy shares). That would be my way of balancing it, anyway.

[ Parent | on HN ]