News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GPT-4. Parent comment

Re:GPT-4 by josho on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @07:24PM (#35160948)
I’m thinking about underwriting. The people that assess the risk of granting a loan or insuring property. These are highly trained specialists. We won’t be able to take gpt4 and replace their job directly, but we’ll mix gpt with other risk models and be able to remove their responsibilities.

The same will be true for many many white collar jobs.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by fidgewidge on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @07:48PM (#35161326)
The ToS forbids that sort of use case.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by semicolon_storm on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @10:27PM (#35162956)
Your entire career hinging on the ToS of a single AI company is not a good position to be in.

Not to mention, the ToS forbids it due to the experimental nature of the tool. In a few years, I doubt the restrictions will be as tight as they are now.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by throwaway743 on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @08:50AM (#35167502)
Yeah, with this model.
[ Parent | on HN ]