You still could not.
Chatgpt could in theory have the knowledge of everything written while your consultant can't.
Sure... But in practice I think a consultant would still provide a higher quality answer. And then, if the bot is not significantly cheaper, what does it matter if it "has more knowledge" in it's network weights?
Re:GPT-4
by ericpauley on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @12:59AM
(#35164075)
Further, a consultant couldn’t meaningfully interpret 50 pages in 2 minutes, even with the most cursory skimming.
Re:GPT-4
by hackernewds on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @01:10AM
(#35164168)
An LLM can never offset a consultants diverse duties though. Some, maybe. However you cannot run healthcare with 90% specificity
Cost of ChatGPT API just dropped 90%. Guaranteed that prices will come down dramatically over time.
I don't get why this comment is downvoted. Basically this.
A halving of the costs every year or so seems realistic in this emerging phase.
Re:GPT-4
by hackernewds on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @01:09AM
(#35164159)
Yet in a capitalist society, against business interests. Look at how Snowflake (the data warehousing company) is driven now, vs before they were public
So sure, still cheap for a doctor appointment, but not pennies. Do it 30 times per hour and you could've just hired a consultant instead.
Does it reason as well with 32k tokens as with 1k tokens? Like you said, humans find it difficult to really comprehend large amounts of content. Who says this machine isn't similarly limited? Just because you can feed it the 32k simultaneously doesn't mean it will actually be used effectively.