It gives the right answer, but it still mentions not leaving C and G alone together, which wasn’t in the requirements.
It still sounds like it’s pattern matching to give a plausible-sounding answer, rather than reasoning through the problem. I think this just shows how easy bullshitting is—you’re even right sometimes!
Re:GPT-4
by gniv on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @02:48AM
(#35164762)
Wow, you're right! I didn't read the answer carefully, only noticed that the sentence before was stating the correct requirement. But that last sentence is wrong (actually as a whole it's nonsense).
It still sounds like it’s pattern matching to give a plausible-sounding answer, rather than reasoning through the problem. I think this just shows how easy bullshitting is—you’re even right sometimes!