Re:GPT4 is up to 6 times more expensive than GPT3.5
by djbusby on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @06:13PM
(#35159763)
OpenTable isn't Open Source. Open, as a word, has more than one context.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GPT4 is up to 6 times more expensive than GPT3.5
by JohnFen on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @06:19PM
(#35159860)
But OpenTable was never open source to begin with, so that association was never made.
Open AI started with a commitment to being open source (thus the "open"), but then they changed their minds and went closed source. I think in this context, keeping the "Open" in their name is a bit deceptive.
It's not the biggest issue in the world, admittedly, but it does leave a bad taste in the mouth.
Re:GPT4 is up to 6 times more expensive than GPT3.5
by djbusby on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @06:21PM
(#35159877)
Oh! that's new information for me. That case does feel like a -n-switch.
Re:GPT4 is up to 6 times more expensive than GPT3.5
by evilduck on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @06:21PM
(#35159888)
OpenTable references restaurants tables and times that are still open to be reserved.
What contextual definition of "open" does OpenAI have? A website open to subscribers?
Re:GPT4 is up to 6 times more expensive than GPT3.5
by icapybara on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @06:38PM
(#35160138)
An open API you can build products off of. Consider the alternative. They could not let anyone use their models and just release AI products (their own search engine, their own version of Teams, their own self driving car software, their own photoshop competitor, etc).
Re:GPT4 is up to 6 times more expensive than GPT3.5
by deelowe on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @07:15PM
(#35160791)
This is revisionist history. OpenAI very much started as a (somewhat) open source (for whatever definition of "open" makes sense for LLMs) initiative.