News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GPT-4. Parent comment

Re:GPT-4 by shamino on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @01:04PM (#35154673)
agreed - can you think of any other model that has such unrestricted release ? Open means available for wide use
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by arthurcolle on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @01:07PM (#35154718)
Stable Diffusion v1.4, v2.1

LLaMA

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by shamino on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @01:13PM (#35154812)
LLaMa technically is only limited to researchers, etc...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by arthurcolle on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @01:31PM (#35155153)
Tell that to the magnet link I clicked on
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by whatshisface on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @01:16PM (#35154885)
The actually open models like BLOOM?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by sylware on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @01:08PM (#35154738)
Where is the noscript/basic (x)html interop support?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by Der_Einzige on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @02:24PM (#35156178)
Go take a look at the content of Civitai. Take everything you see there, and imagine what happens if you start prompting it with words that indicate things which may not be legal for you to see images of.

Please show me viable harm of GPT-4 that is higher than the potential harm from open sourced image generators with really good fine tuning. I'll wait, most likely forever.

[ Parent | on HN ]