News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SVB shows that there are few libertarians in a financial ... by yunwal on Monday March 13, 2023 @09:15PM (#35145968)
> This is not the customers/depositors' fault.

To be clear, it's not the customers' fault, but they also shouldn't expect FDIC insurance to cover any of their deposits beyond $250k. Whatever happens to their personal money is their responsibility

Re:SVB shows that there are few libertarians in a financial ... by TuringNYC on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @08:01AM (#35150128)
>> To be clear, it's not the customers' fault, but they also shouldn't expect FDIC insurance to cover any of their deposits beyond $250k. Whatever happens to their personal money is their responsibility

Note that many customers had their excess funds not in bank deposits, but in US treasury bills / short term bonds via a Money Market Sweep Account. Except it turned out the assets of the MM account were not in their name but in SVB's name via a custodial account, and hence is locked up, and would have been locked up in bankruptcy.