SVB shows that there are few libertarians in a financial foxhole

Re:SVB shows that there are few libertarians in a financial ... by miguelazo on Monday March 13, 2023 @06:53PM (#35144294)

I suppose some or even most libertarians would agree with that, although that system is just rigidly regulated in a different way. I think the classic Libertarian model would be private banks, totally disassociated from government. Further, full reserve banking and fixed supply monetary systems are the stuff of fantasies. Totally infeasible in the real world.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SVB shows that there are few libertarians in a financial ... by fidgewidge on Monday March 13, 2023 @07:13PM (#35144551)

They're both entirely feasible. The usual canard is that without fractional reserve there is no lending or not "enough" lending, but with full reserve there is still lending of course because people would like a return on their assets. There would be less bad lending but that's what we want, even if it leads to a temporary drop in GDP.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SVB shows that there are few libertarians in a financial ... by miguelazo on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @02:32PM (#35172676)

Wasn't the main concern that a fixed quantity of money chasing a constantly increasing quantity of goods/services would eventually cause severe deflation?

[ Parent | on HN ]