Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by eppp on Monday March 13, 2023 @08:07AM
(#35134550)
Ill be glad to have an uncomfortable conversation for a few million dollars.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by sidlls on Monday March 13, 2023 @09:01AM
(#35135123)
The "uncomfortable conversation" can mean a conversation about breaking insider trading regulations, the penalties for which include huge fines and potentially jail time.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by ModernMech on Monday March 13, 2023 @08:16AM
(#35134655)
> the CEO will have some very uncomfortable conversations.
Oh no! Not uncomfortable conversations! Anything but that! Maybe it will be followed up with a strongly worded letter with an implied threat of a performative vote by Congress. How will they cope?! They might even have to show up at a gasp House committee hearing! shudders
Wake me when someone is convicted.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by op00to on Monday March 13, 2023 @08:24AM
(#35134742)
So edgy. Let’s just bypass investigations and go directly into summary execution. Eat the rich!!!!!
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by sidlls on Monday March 13, 2023 @10:11AM
(#35135938)
"Wake me when someone is convicted" isn't an "eat the rich" statement. The OPs point is that an "uncomfortable conversation" isn't a punishment for wrongdoing, such as insider trading.
How is selling stock tantamount to a government bailout?