News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How 'Open' Is OpenAI, Really? by ivalm on Monday March 13, 2023 @03:30AM (#35132317)
People have decent oss solutions for running inference. There are currently no high quality oss code for training and the best checkpoints are still unavailable (gpt3.5+4/palm/claude)…

There are only a few hundred folks who have actual experience training at this scale.

llama is both not oss and not as good as da-vinci-003/etc. Prob best actual oss model is like flan-t5-xxl.

Re:How 'Open' Is OpenAI, Really? by recuter on Monday March 13, 2023 @03:48AM (#35132431)
So we can't lay eggs yet, at least we got one. Who knows what might hatch.
Re:How 'Open' Is OpenAI, Really? by ivalm on Monday March 13, 2023 @03:53AM (#35132462)
I guess I just felt an objection about “[oss] running circles around OpenAI.” The reality is that the core technology is still very unapproachable (making these models). OSS solved like 1% of the total problem/difficulty.

My biggest hope is that meta/google/anthropic actually decide to release training code + data + checkpoint. Meta is most likely to do it but still unlikely

Without that it would take eutherai/carperai to really exceed expectations for OSS to be competitive.