How 'Open' Is OpenAI, Really?

Re:How 'Open' Is OpenAI, Really? by blackoil on Monday March 13, 2023 @01:54AM (#35131666)

It may not be 'Open' in sense of open-source or free, but it is open that I can access it and use it in my projects. Before this companies like Google/Facebook had such models but closed in sense that we can get some papers and blog posts but can't rely on them to build our startup.

Because of financial and people resources required, availability of data etc. rest always stayed. Now I can use ChatGPT, Gpt-3/4, Whisper etc. at a reasonable cost and it is forcing rest of the industry to also "Open" up.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How 'Open' Is OpenAI, Really? by otabdeveloper4 on Monday March 13, 2023 @02:28AM (#35131864)

That, like, an incredibly low bar as to what's considered "open".

(For all we know ChatGPT might be just an outsourced Indian call center under the hood. We don't actually know how it works.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How 'Open' Is OpenAI, Really? by ly3xqhl8g9 on Monday March 13, 2023 @03:02AM (#35132106)

OpenishAI

The Indian was too expensive, it is a Kenyan [1].

[1] "OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less Than $2 Per Hour to Make ChatGPT Less Toxic" https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers

[ Parent | on HN ]