News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SVB Used Former McCarthy Staffers to Weaken Regulations, ... by whitemary on Sunday March 12, 2023 @01:46PM (#35123443)
And those regulations were opposed by the unions that Biden crushed by forcing them back to work.

It's a class conflict, not a partisan one.

Re:SVB Used Former McCarthy Staffers to Weaken Regulations, ... by enriquec on Sunday March 12, 2023 @02:05PM (#35123764)
Its understood that those regulations wouldn’t have saved the train in Palestine. That’s one problem with the discourse on the left. I don’t favor regulation for the sake of regulation - nor cutting it for its own sake. There obviously needs to be a rational best-effort cost-benefit analysis. Not cheap politics.
Re:SVB Used Former McCarthy Staffers to Weaken Regulations, ... by whitemary on Sunday March 12, 2023 @02:12PM (#35123886)
You really think people are that stupid? Biden and the Democrats had their chance either way. They chose to crush the unions, so the burden of proof is on them. However, since this is politics, nobody is going to listen because it's too damn late.
Re:SVB Used Former McCarthy Staffers to Weaken Regulations, ... by rgbrenner on Sunday March 12, 2023 @02:36PM (#35124239)
It was bipartisan. Republicans also agreed to crush the strike. You can go look at the vote in congress if you think the republicans were standing up for railroad unions.
Re:SVB Used Former McCarthy Staffers to Weaken Regulations, ... by pessimizer on Sunday March 12, 2023 @04:12PM (#35125595)
> There obviously needs to be a rational best-effort cost-benefit analysis.

You don't seriously think there haven't been many? The problem is that train companies, governments, and people who care about the environment classify and price costs and benefits differently, and government was paid to adopt train company calculus.

It's not that nobody ever thought of figuring out the costs or the benefits of this major, well-known proposed change.