Re:Urgent: Sign the petition now
by notmindthegap on Saturday March 11, 2023 @06:49PM
(#35114042)
Genuinely asking: for startups who were not banking with SVB, is the recent event a good thing from a competitive standpoint?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Imagine half of your vendors/customers are insolvent. Is this good?
Of course, many startups' customers are not other startups.
In YC it often is. You are almost expected to prop up other YCs companies with your funds. If everyone buys each others services everyone can show their super duper growth and nobody lost anything (except VCs who invest later).
Re:Urgent: Sign the petition now
by umanwizard on Saturday March 11, 2023 @06:57PM
(#35114165)
On the other hand, many are.
Exactly. It will be interesting to see who and what gets shutdown in the next 30 days if the issue isn't rectified.
Re:Urgent: Sign the petition now
by nightmarish on Saturday March 11, 2023 @06:52PM
(#35114084)
Are they good people?
If they aren’t then yes it’s excellent!
Do all start-ups only sell stuff to other start-ups? If yes, that's their problem right there.
Re:Urgent: Sign the petition now
by nightmarish on Saturday March 11, 2023 @06:55PM
(#35114143)
Money laundering is a great gig until someone launders too much.
That’s why there’s a vendor word in my reply
So if you're B2C (not B2B) and you only have 1 or 2 non-vital vendors that are likely to be impacted?
If your competitors can't pay their employees you can poach them for very cheap if they are desperate to make rent or mortgage payments. So more sensible competitors might even benefit from the stupider ones.
provided their main customer base is not from the area or the sector then it's pretty fantastic for them, especially if they had significant competition in their business model and many of those competitors are now insolvent