News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Coffeeshop Fallacy by DHPersonal on Saturday March 11, 2023 @03:30PM (#35112378)
(Increased) density doesn’t have to mean an absolute lack of any open fields, does it? Doesn’t density offer a probability that countryside can be closer to one’s home?
Re:The Coffeeshop Fallacy by logifail on Saturday March 11, 2023 @04:39PM (#35113032)
> Doesn’t density offer a probability that countryside can be closer to one’s home?

I was responding to someone suggesting that increased density would help with retail profitability.

If we were ro make housing more dense but use the extra space as countryside that's not going to provide any more customers within the catchment area of the OP's coffee shop, is it?

Re:The Coffeeshop Fallacy by SECProto on Saturday March 11, 2023 @08:49PM (#35115455)
> If we were to make housing more dense but use the extra space as countryside that's not going to provide any more customers within the catchment area of the OP's coffee shop, is it?

If your current area has 400 residents but you can still easily walk to open fields, increasing that to 1200 residents in the same area would triple potential coffee customers while maintaining the same access to countryside.