Re:Samsung “space zoom” moon shots are fake, and here is the...
by pessimizer on Saturday March 11, 2023 @11:26AM
(#35109737)
You're objecting to things that no one in this thread has claimed. You're taking an argument you've had other places and continuing it here.
I watched the testimony, it was accurately characterized by the person you replied to, and it was a good argument for the defense to make.
Re:Samsung “space zoom” moon shots are fake, and here is the...
by dtx1 on Saturday March 11, 2023 @11:35AM
(#35109884)
It was accurate in the sense that the lawyer used the word ai. In context the lawyer said "Apple uses logarithms (sic) and AI to enhance the images. I don't know how that works". The word AI was used but in context the non-technical lawyer simply meant image enhancing algorithms. No one in that room actually discussed AI.
That being said, one could interpret the top comment that way.
Re:Samsung “space zoom” moon shots are fake, and here is the...
by UncleEntity on Saturday March 11, 2023 @11:33AM
(#35109861)
It’s funny, twenty years ago I was specifically told not to use digital cameras but the crappy disposable film camera provided in case of an accident precisely because the digital version could be contested in court.
Re:Samsung “space zoom” moon shots are fake, and here is the...
by ThrowawayTestr on Saturday March 11, 2023 @11:31AM
(#35109824)
All this worry about AIs framing people when people can't even interpret regular evidence.
This is what the defense actually said: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sf7xCMFBv5c
And here's the expert witness the defense brought on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GhsbizmfMs