Re:FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank
by anamexis on Friday March 10, 2023 @01:23PM
(#35098656)
Does that means panics are necessary at every other bank, seeing as how their liquidity is similar (or worse)?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank
by JumpCrisscross on Friday March 10, 2023 @01:28PM
(#35098724)
> every other bank, seeing as how their liquidity is similar
Source?
SVB had an unusual amount of long-duration assets. Most banks maintain a buffer of low-yielding, highly-liquid on-the-run Treasuries.
Re:FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank
by nostrebored on Friday March 10, 2023 @01:54PM
(#35099165)
I would not find it surprising if bank liquidity was actually historically low, especially considering that many banks do maintain buffers _of the same covaried assets_ and that banks _induce covariance when they choose to use an asset class for liquidity_.
Maybe ZFRB was just a really, really bad idea.
Not anymore. Very few maintain this, JPM being the notable exception.
The only difference is that panic set in and there was a bank run, largely led by VCs telling startups to pull their money.