Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight ChatGPT

Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha... by yunohn on Friday March 10, 2023 @05:35AM (#35092752)

I’m not sure why GP used the minus operator - I omitted that part and still got results about usage and not emissions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha... by fock on Friday March 10, 2023 @05:59AM (#35092915)

I want to get statistics and numbers. I'm aware of the applications. GPs suggestions didn't really help me either.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha... by mtlmtlmtlmtl on Friday March 10, 2023 @06:18AM (#35093021)

Did another search for "industrial consumption of CO2", again without the quotes, and found this: https://www.iea.org/reports/putting-co2-to-use

Sure this talks a lot about emissions, but it also seems to include a detailed breakdown of various industrial uses for CO2, with numbers, projections, statistics and all.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha... by yunohn on Friday March 10, 2023 @08:44AM (#35094221)

https://www.iea.org/reports/putting-co2-to-use

First result for “co2 industrial usage numbers”, without quotes - just like the sibling comment.

You need to specify atleast a few keywords to clarify what you’re looking for - search engine nor llm chatbot nor HN commenters can read your mind…

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha... by mtlmtlmtlmtl on Friday March 10, 2023 @06:03AM (#35092933)

Specifically because they said they only found stuff on emissions. Never tried it without.

It's one of the most common patterns I come across. I search word X but find a bunch of word Y stuff that's not what I'm looking for, because word X and Y appear together a lot in Y's context. So I add -Y to the query.

[ Parent | on HN ]