News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight ChatGPT. Parent comment

Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha... by diceduckmonk on Friday March 10, 2023 @01:33AM (#35091134)
What framework would you have preferred be endemic instead of Boq?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha... by marmee on Friday March 10, 2023 @02:07AM (#35091357)
pod? boq acts as if it gives you modularity but try attaching C++ code to Java
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha... by zodiakzz on Friday March 10, 2023 @02:23AM (#35091466)
What are boq and pod..? (curious non-Googler here, Google search didn't help).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha... by xnx on Friday March 10, 2023 @05:10AM (#35092589)
Some info here: https://www.teamblind.com/post/Googles-Boq-Wiz-Soy-framework...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha... by marmee on Friday March 10, 2023 @06:41AM (#35093169)
Both are infrastructure frameworks used to run servers
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha... by 003304 on Friday March 10, 2023 @12:32PM (#35097811)
Boq sells itself the wrong way. The real point of Boq is to just run your stuff, and as a consequence you have to use its annoying code framework for reasons I'll never understand.

Pod seems fine on paper, but it's awful. Every little thing you want to do is a huge codelab, and it's less supported. So people default to Boq instead.

[ Parent | on HN ]