Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl...
by badrabbit on Thursday March 09, 2023 @10:29PM
(#35090046)
But like, it is someone else's country. They just may not like the look of it and that would be the end of the story, maybe move on to ocean based solar+current hybrid power generators?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl...
by lumost on Thursday March 09, 2023 @10:53PM
(#35090160)
What’s wrong with a country exporting their solar resources? An arid resource less desert can become an economic boon.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl...
by badrabbit on Thursday March 09, 2023 @10:57PM
(#35090178)
Why are you asking me that as if I made that claim?
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl...
by stu2b50 on Thursday March 09, 2023 @10:53PM
(#35090161)
Morroco is the one pushing for it, in this case. It's not like the nation state in question is being forced into it. They see it as a major opportunity to export energy, a famously lucrative enterprise for countries.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl...
by badrabbit on Thursday March 09, 2023 @10:56PM
(#35090172)
I didn't dispute that, i just said the value of it is not the only consideration, you still need to test it out before deciding, regardless of who pushed for it.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl...
by Ekaros on Friday March 10, 2023 @02:13AM
(#35091404)
Also the possible political leverage is substantial one. At least in short term.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl...
by rswskg on Friday March 10, 2023 @06:58AM
(#35093299)
They should into becoming a low cost synth hydrocarbon exporter. They would take over using current infrastructure.