News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by tails4e on Thursday March 09, 2023 @07:22PM (#35088846)
That's a stretch. We're literally talking about arid almost-wasteland. A few sq miles is a small portion, yet will provide clean power. The cost benefit is abundantly clear.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by badrabbit on Thursday March 09, 2023 @10:29PM (#35090046)
But like, it is someone else's country. They just may not like the look of it and that would be the end of the story, maybe move on to ocean based solar+current hybrid power generators?
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by lumost on Thursday March 09, 2023 @10:53PM (#35090160)
What’s wrong with a country exporting their solar resources? An arid resource less desert can become an economic boon.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by badrabbit on Thursday March 09, 2023 @10:57PM (#35090178)
Why are you asking me that as if I made that claim?
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by stu2b50 on Thursday March 09, 2023 @10:53PM (#35090161)
Morroco is the one pushing for it, in this case. It's not like the nation state in question is being forced into it. They see it as a major opportunity to export energy, a famously lucrative enterprise for countries.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by badrabbit on Thursday March 09, 2023 @10:56PM (#35090172)
I didn't dispute that, i just said the value of it is not the only consideration, you still need to test it out before deciding, regardless of who pushed for it.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by Ekaros on Friday March 10, 2023 @02:13AM (#35091404)
Also the possible political leverage is substantial one. At least in short term.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by rswskg on Friday March 10, 2023 @06:58AM (#35093299)
They should into becoming a low cost synth hydrocarbon exporter. They would take over using current infrastructure.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by adam-a on Friday March 10, 2023 @08:46AM (#35094240)
The article discusses this. Egypt are apparently starting to produce a lot of green hydrogen for export to Europe.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by rswskg on Monday March 13, 2023 @07:39AM (#35134280)
Green hydrogen is definetly not a hydrocarbon.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by jnsaff2 on Friday March 10, 2023 @02:26AM (#35091485)
I urge you to pick up and read Desert Solitaire[0] and reconsider your 'wasteland' statement.

Benefit/cost might be there, but for a project costing 22B it would be sensible to study and quantify.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert_Solitaire

Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by Felminor on Friday March 10, 2023 @08:51AM (#35094288)
As depressing as it is, better destroying that env than the more rich env
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by Rebelgecko on Friday March 10, 2023 @07:04PM (#35103183)
IMO as a planet we should try to move beyond that sort of colonialism. Yes the UK is a richer country, but that doesn't make their ecosystem inherently more valuable.
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by Felminor on Saturday March 11, 2023 @03:44AM (#35106629)
I would say more diverse because the weather allows it
Re:$22B project to provide 8% of UK energy via undersea cabl... by jnsaff2 on Monday March 13, 2023 @03:33AM (#35132346)
One could argue that the environment in UK is already destroyed, why protect that instead of something that is still relatively untouched?