Re:VC firms are urging founders to pull money from troubled ...
by convolvatron on Thursday March 09, 2023 @05:58PM
(#35088038)
not ..completely. startups have a slightly different profile than normal businesses, and SVB is well-oiled machine for working with them. maybe its more charitable to say that they have specialized?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:VC firms are urging founders to pull money from troubled ...
by majormajor on Thursday March 09, 2023 @06:08PM
(#35088148)
To me that just seems like another reason, if you're someone backing multiple startups exposed to the overall health of the ecosystem, to point people to different options so you don't have a single point of failure.
Surely there are enough banks and bankers around that you could have half a dozen or more specialists? It's knowledge work, not something needing billions in physical infrastructure investment.
Re:VC firms are urging founders to pull money from troubled ...
by kasey_junk on Thursday March 09, 2023 @06:30PM
(#35088385)
The NY Fed looked at lending specialization actually improved Bank lending performance https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff...
This has to do with deposit specialization which I don’t know if it’s been studied, but you could see the same arguments applying to.
Re:VC firms are urging founders to pull money from troubled ...
by majormajor on Thursday March 09, 2023 @07:33PM
(#35088925)
If you're an individual startup, you don't care about the overall system, just maximizing your own. So that efficiency seems great.
But if you're a VC with a broad portfolio, you're much more exposed to the single-point-of-failure risks that come with increased efficiency.
"Give up some efficiency for system robustness and long-term-health" is a no-brainer for mature engineering orgs, but in this financialized world nobody can see the longer term big picture