Re:Bank Run at Silicon Valley Bank
by njarboe on Thursday March 09, 2023 @05:17PM
(#35087589)
If 30 year housing loans were not available, housing would be a lot cheaper.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bank Run at Silicon Valley Bank
by subroutine on Thursday March 09, 2023 @06:02PM
(#35088080)
Can't be cheaper than the materials and labor costs to build it. If house prices get too cheap house builders / contractors will stop building. This will pinch supply and keep house prices high enough that only cash rich (corps and banks) can afford them. Most people will have no choice but to rent indefinitely. Those who manage to save up some $400k may finally afford to buy a house just in time for retirement.
Re:Bank Run at Silicon Valley Bank
by diordiderot on Thursday March 09, 2023 @06:21PM
(#35088290)
But if house prices (and therefore rents) go down, people will need lower salaries for an equally comfortable life, pushing labour costs down, making housing cheaper. Man economics is easy
Re:Bank Run at Silicon Valley Bank
by subroutine on Friday March 10, 2023 @12:38AM
(#35090799)
Why would rent go down if a substantial part of the market is owned by a monolith (banks/institutional investors) who can impose price control? This is already slowly happening.
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/21/how-wall-street-bought-singl...
No, but there would be a lot more renters.
Or, and this seems far more likely, it would be owned by a very small group of people or corporations or the government.
Someone will always have money.
The system we have now may not be perfect but it a far far more egalitarian than the past when there were no loans
Re:Bank Run at Silicon Valley Bank
by selimthegrim on Thursday March 09, 2023 @09:04PM
(#35089550)
Canada would like a word.