Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell
by lotsofpulp on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @05:40PM
(#35075782)
In your scenario, the costs seem to outweigh the benefits because police and/or the courts are dropping the ball on prosecuting thieves.
> I keep change in two (usually) unlocked cars as bait.
Round these parts you would return to your car and the window would be smashed.
> Check out ... sites like Nextdoor some time
Highly reccomended - but dont go alone, take a support person with you to pull you back to reality after a few minutes, it is a truly horrific place.
Around the time the bait disappeared, the police were pursuing a suspect from house to house at 2am. If it was the same person, and I had proof, stealing from parked cars would be the least of anyone's concern.
What are the odds your local police are going to take your package theft footage and actually pursue the thief? Even for more serious crimes, it's questionable whether they will seek (or use) camera evidence, or be successful if they do. I know of an armed robbery attempt that occurred close to home, and to my knowledge no inquiries were made regarding camera evidence (I was a witness).
I can think of plenty of concrete uses for surveillance cameras, sure, but I'd say the costs vastly outweigh the benefits for most people using them today.
Check out some online social (fearmongering) sites like Nextdoor some time - it's nothing but busybodies speculating that the person parked on the street is casing their house or stealing packages. Quick, report them to the cops.
Oops. The local cops no longer accept 'suspicious person or vehicle' reports unless there is a crime in progress.