News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by l72 on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @04:57PM (#35075295)
I have several cameras hooked up to an NVR that has 2TB drives for constant recording (when space runs out older recordings are deleted. I usually have a few weeks available).

I then have frigate[1] set up on a small fitlet (with a usb CORAL TPU), which gives me excellent control over detection (Humans vs dogs vs cars vs ...). Frigate grabs the streams from my NVR over rstp.

This is then hooked up to my Home Assistant where I have various rules to send alerts to my mobile devices based upon object detected, location of camera, and time of day.

Everything is internal. I have an always on wireguard on my family's mobile devices allowing them to access the cameras and home assistant alerts from anywhere.

It works great, but I have refused to set this up for my extended family (even though they have the same NVR and _really_ want my system), just because there are a lot of moving pieces that need to be maintained (not to mention having a server + vpn)

[1] https://frigate.video/

Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by phil21 on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @05:10PM (#35075446)
Frigate looks pretty interesting. Do you have an estimation of how much CPU it's using for your cameras?

I have about a dozen 4k cameras I'd love to migrate to a much more capable NVR, but doing so with software typically means I go from a 30W NVR to maxing out a 8 core 200W Xeon even without object detection.

Would love to kill my Duaha NVR and toss this on the Proxmox cluster instead.

Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by ssl232 on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @05:43PM (#35075810)
The Frigate website seems to heavily recommend a Coral card to offload the bulk of the processing from the CPU.

EDIT: looks like CPU still used for video decoding regardless of Coral being available: https://docs.frigate.video/frigate/hardware/#do-hwaccel-args...

Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by libraryatnight on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @06:11PM (#35076086)
I really dig this idea. I think you just gave me my next project.
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by _rs on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @06:52PM (#35076408)
Could you share which model cameras and NVR you're using? I've been wanting to put something together like this for a while, but all of the solutions I've seen require a Windows box (usually running Blue Iris) for the NVR which I want to avoid
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by kccqzy on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @07:04PM (#35076525)
Someone should sell a complete solution to make it easy for non-techies to use. Sell a small computer (perhaps a Raspberry Pi) with the right software installed, the Coral accelerator, and several cameras bundled in a package. Make it clear that this is just a sale of hardware, not cloud data storage. It should be as easy as buying a Ring or a Nest, otherwise it will forever just be tech people's toys.
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by hot_gril on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @07:16PM (#35076627)
This is what I was thinking. Is there maybe not a big enough market for non-techies who care about privacy?

It needs to be basically the same as a Ring with just one additional requirement, plugging another box into power and your network to act as the DVR/brains, with a QR code that you scan to link it. Sure that can have more customization options, but the default has to be zero config. Probably gonna need a cloud server for notifying and serving the mobile app without having keys to the video, which would cost money monthly.

Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by lazide on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @08:14PM (#35077133)
There are hundreds of different NVR solutions out there. The consumer ones are... meh. But they mostly work.

The reality is that except for companies, almost no one REALLY cares about it. It's an expense they'd usually rather not have (like backups), so it always gets the short end of the stick.

Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by pclmulqdq on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @08:48PM (#35077402)
I tried that product a couple of times on Google ads, and fewer people clicked on "buy now" than my sister's joke product of "lipstick for your pit bull."

People really don't understand this enough to even know that there's a problem. I have explained to a lot of people that "the cloud" just means renting someone else's computer, and they still don't get it.

Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by propogandist on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @10:28PM (#35078017)
Google Ads is too aggressive for this sort of product that requires knowledge of many things. The product is niche and would need a simple youtube video series to explain it, with a descriptive title and description text.

Ideally, in the video(s) you can talk about how the viewer can setup the solution themselves, breaking it down into components, why each is important and how it all works.

Also introduce how the viewer can buy the entire solution from you directly, where’ll they’ll get some custom support/troubleshooting or they may just hire you for consulting.

This will function as your funnel to let your target customers find your solution as they search for ways to problems they have self-identified.

If you’d like you can also do retargeting ads on the viewers of your video, as they’d be more likely to buy your solution vs the avg joe.

Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by pclmulqdq on Thursday March 09, 2023 @12:39PM (#35084059)
I'm more hopeful for humanity now that I know my testing methodology was bad. Thanks for the information!
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by int_19h on Friday March 10, 2023 @08:48PM (#35104222)
For this kind of thing, you'd want to advertise it on e.g. Tindie - that's where the likely target audience would look for it, I think.
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by Foxhuls on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @07:37PM (#35076806)
I just wish it hasn’t been almost impossible to get a coral you for the last few years
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by JKCalhoun on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @09:11PM (#35077562)
I was okay with Arlo for several years — primarily because it didn't have a subscription. With Arlo circling the drain now, I think a cloud-less DIY option is an excellent idea.
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by grvdrm on Thursday March 09, 2023 @08:25AM (#35080912)
What NVR? I’m trying to put together my own system. Also, curious - all cameras POE or do you have some that are local wifi instead?