Initial support for guided disk encryption in OpenBSD installer

Re:Initial support for guided disk encryption in OpenBSD ins... by Zurrrrr on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @12:07PM (#35071633)

You're very wrong about SELinux and I assume haven't touched it in years. It's enabled by default in Fedora, other distros use it as well, and it really isn't at all that big a deal to learn and configure proportional to the benefit.

I'm not remotely wrong about OpenBSD, and that manpage doesn't contain anything that contradicts a point I've made.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Initial support for guided disk encryption in OpenBSD ins... by stonogo on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @05:46PM (#35075847)

I administer thousands of selinux boxes professionally. I, like the vast majority of Earth's population, remain steadfastly uninterested in Fedora's default behavior.

You claim that OpenBSD has no conpromised-root mitigation. I have provided evidence to back my counterclaim. I will assume your rejection of actual evidence indicates a disinterest in good-faith argument, so I won't bother pressing the point, except to mention that you may be more successful persuading people to support your case if you adopt a reality-based approach to argument instead of just making wild-ass assumptions about other people.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Initial support for guided disk encryption in OpenBSD ins... by Zurrrrr on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @06:13PM (#35076102)

You haven't provided evidence at all, that's the thing. You're either wrong or misunderstanding something.

[ Parent | on HN ]