News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The privacy loophole in your doorbell.

Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by aleksandrh on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @12:04PM (#35071581)
Police: We suspect your neighbor committed a crime...

You: Okay

Police: ...so we're going to need all the footage from inside your home

You: Wait wha—

Judge: Sure, I'll sign a warrant for this. That sounds perfectly reasonable.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by mattkrause on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @02:23PM (#35073556)
And so you move to quash some or all of that request!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by hooverd on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @02:31PM (#35073639)
Simple as...?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by henryfjordan on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @02:46PM (#35073828)
More like:

Police: Hey can we get a warrant for all the Ring cameras on this street. Oh and we know for a fact that there's a guy with more exterior cameras who has refused to share footage with us.

Judge: Sure, I'll sign that warrant. Nobody would be dumb enough to put Ring cameras in their house.

Guy who is that dumb: I'm not going to fight the warrant even though I got a letter saying I can totally prevent my interior cameras from being included in the data Ring turns over.

[ Parent | on HN ]