News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WA House passes bill banning single-family zoning by solarmist on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @11:10AM (#35070770)
This is a misleading headline. Banning single family only zoning.
Re:WA House passes bill banning single-family zoning by yboris on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @11:17AM (#35070861)
Unsure I follow. The title is "banning single family zoning" means it no longer exist - which seems equivalent to "banning single family only zoning".

Direct link to bill page: https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=1110&Year=2023...

Re:WA House passes bill banning single-family zoning by solarmist on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @11:49AM (#35071336)
I read it as requiring multi family residences, which would be extreme and unwanted by all.
Re:WA House passes bill banning single-family zoning by themadturk on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @04:33PM (#35075044)
No, it would only ban zoning that allows only single family homes, as zoning laws often do now. It would not require multifamily homes. The article points out that similar laws in California so far have resulted only in limited change to home building.
Re:WA House passes bill banning single-family zoning by advisedwang on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @12:22PM (#35071858)
solarmist is suggesting the title sounds like zoning now forbids single-family houses, whereas it actually bans requiring single-family houses (ie them being the only type of residence allowed).
Re:WA House passes bill banning single-family zoning by yboris on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @12:28PM (#35071965)
I thought that's what "single-family zoning" means: a requirement to have nothing else besides single family houses. Eliminating this category of zoning means you can no longer mandate "only single family houses".

I'm unsure if zoning laws behave radically differently, but I'm thinking the best model is what they have in Japan:

http://urbankchoze.blogspot.com/2014/04/japanese-zoning.html

Things that can only be built in "low rise residential" zones can still be built in "neighborhood commercial", etc. See chart:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sV5ETXDs_8M/Ux-axBTuF2I/AAAAAAAAAs...

Re:WA House passes bill banning single-family zoning by vndsodfogis on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @12:29PM (#35071974)
"single family zoning" means zoning that is only for single family housing. there is nothing misleading about the title.
Re:WA House passes bill banning single-family zoning by _aavaa_ on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @02:05PM (#35073331)
To someone not familiar with the technical meaning "bill banning single-family zoning" reads like "a bill which imposes a ban on allowing you to build single-family houses".
Re:WA House passes bill banning single-family zoning by vndsodfogis on Thursday March 09, 2023 @06:29PM (#35088372)
just because someone doesn't know what words mean it doesnt mean that the words are misleading
Re:WA House passes bill banning single-family zoning by _aavaa_ on Friday March 10, 2023 @09:51AM (#35094961)
It absolutely can, as evidenced by several comments here.

As a second example. If you tell people that an object is inflammable. I would except that some non-negligible portion of people to assume that the object is not flammable.

Re:WA House passes bill banning single-family zoning by more_corn on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @04:28PM (#35074974)
It’s misleading because it implies that single family homes will be banned.
Re:WA House passes bill banning single-family zoning by adamredwoods on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @06:28PM (#35076211)
It was to me. I am not familiar with zoning terminology.