Re:Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
by esperent on Tuesday March 07, 2023 @02:35AM
(#35052625)
* * *
Re:Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
by doctor_eval on Tuesday March 07, 2023 @08:01AM
(#35054826)
A ten second load time is about 100x worse than it should be.
Exaggerating it to several minutes is less egregious by an order of magnitude.
Re:Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
by AlotOfReading on Tuesday March 07, 2023 @10:49AM
(#35056681)
I measured that extreme load time with a stopwatch and the debug console, but it was admittedly under abnormal circumstances. Not sure I'd notice 10s TTI enough to complain. That's a pretty normal number these days.
A lot of anecdotes are possibly from some years ago where self-hosting JIRA meant a single server on-premise. You might not get a lot of resources and can be used by the entire organization. The server would be at or over capacity 90% of the time so things could take forever to load.
Self-hosted JIRA also opened up to lots of customisations and hacks, which often weren't performant.
Re:Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
by jamesfinlayson on Tuesday March 07, 2023 @08:09PM
(#35063835)
With enough data it's possible - I remember a colleague going to a conference and chatting with some Atlassian people and they said their priority (this was probably 2016 or 2017) was getting Jira to be performant for companies with 500,000+ people. With enough users, labels, releases etc I can see Jira churning on something for minutes.
But actual minutes to load stuff? That is insane and I can see where the loathing would come from.