News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Low-code development (Node-RED alternative) by dspillett on Monday March 06, 2023 @06:06PM (#35049111)
> it is saying that our IP and content we provide (config, nodes, data, etc.) still belongs to us, but they can also use it however they want.

A great many services have similar stipulations. This is similar to how GitHub was OK to use all the public repositories on its service as training fodder for copilot. Though there are ongoing arguments as to how this applies to code someone else uploaded: they didn't necessarily have the right to assign those rights to GH so the legal status is less clear than their terms of service might suggest.

Re:Low-code development (Node-RED alternative) by dragonwriter on Tuesday March 07, 2023 @10:08AM (#35056140)
> This is similar to how GitHub was OK to use all the public repositories on its service as training fodder for copilot.

Microsoft asserts that it had the right to do this under Fair Use, not the Github user agreement.