Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi...
by DanTheManPR on Monday March 06, 2023 @01:01PM
(#35044827)
But it's not as though property taxes and ongoing maintenance costs don't exist for apartments. The income the owner receives from the rents has to cover all of that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi...
by jedberg on Monday March 06, 2023 @01:27PM
(#35045308)
Exactly. That's why if your mortgage == rent then you're behind. Because rent already includes those things.
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi...
by RHSeeger on Monday March 06, 2023 @02:07PM
(#35046016)
Well, yes and no. If you own and the roof needs replacing, you need to have that money on hand (or be able to take out another loan to cover it, which isn't always possible). If you rent, you don't.
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi...
by 8note on Tuesday March 07, 2023 @02:00AM
(#35052427)
Well, if you rent, you rely on the landlord to be able to do that, and if they can't, you're still screwed
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi...
by RHSeeger on Tuesday March 07, 2023 @03:01PM
(#35060387)
I don't see how that's important to the discussion at all. Sure, if you live somewhere, a problem with the roof is "your problem". But if you own, it's also "your responsibility" vs renting where it's "their responsibility". And the person whose responsibility it is is the one that is saddled with the need to acquire that lump sum of money to deal with it.