Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief
by msrenee on Monday March 06, 2023 @12:43AM
(#35037867)
What's happening to lower middle class kids in Iowa? I'm honestly just confused here. To my knowledge, they're getting decent lower middle class jobs and doing fine. Maybe going off to college and moving to the coast, probably not unless they want to leave. I don't think of that particular group of individuals as disadvantaged, at least not in the context of getting into a good college.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief
by tomcam on Monday March 06, 2023 @01:14AM
(#35038020)
Yeah Iowa is getting totally jacked in this thread.
Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief
by msrenee on Monday March 06, 2023 @07:52AM
(#35040372)
People on the coasts and even in the big cities in the Midwest just can't seem to wrap their heads around the fact that a lot of us wouldn't be willing to live in New York City or California for all the money in the world. It's not that one lifestyle is inherently better. People have different preferences and it's pretty condescending to think that folks who live in the great plains and don't go to the big name schools are only in that situation for lack of opportunity.
Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief
by throwaway894345 on Monday March 06, 2023 @10:17AM
(#35041979)
We’re not talking about settling in NYC or Cali, we’re talking about the opportunity to compete with rich coastal kids for positions in top schools.
Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief
by throwaway894345 on Monday March 06, 2023 @10:14AM
(#35041950)
My position is that it’s an injustice if an Ivy-caliber student from a lower-middle class background is denied top educational opportunities because they don’t have the family pedigree of wealthier, more middling students. We would expect upward mobility here, we shouldn’t content ourselves with “at least they’re not getting poorer than their parents”.