News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Self Hosted SaaS Alternatives by roxgib on Sunday March 05, 2023 @07:56PM (#35036175)
I have a $4/month VPS that comes with a static IP address. Any reason you shouldn't use that as a proxy to solve the dynamic IP problem?
Re:Self Hosted SaaS Alternatives by stonewall on Sunday March 05, 2023 @08:13PM (#35036309)
Nope, that would totally work.
Re:Self Hosted SaaS Alternatives by gtaylor on Sunday March 05, 2023 @09:35PM (#35036874)
Some providers block or score hit IPs from popular provider blocks due to the amount of spam that comes from them.
Re:Self Hosted SaaS Alternatives by toad_master on Sunday March 05, 2023 @09:51PM (#35036985)
These IPs are often used by spammers before you get them and have bad reputations, but that's usually a solvable problem.
Re:Self Hosted SaaS Alternatives by aborsy on Sunday March 05, 2023 @10:01PM (#35037047)
But if you own the IP for 6 months with no abuse, wouldn’t that solve the problem?
Re:Self Hosted SaaS Alternatives by wankle on Sunday March 05, 2023 @10:44PM (#35037304)
I've done it for a couple of years, all traffic comes into the VPS and Wireguard immediately redirects to my home machine VM. I can take the VM down, bring it up on another machine, it calls to my VPS to the Wireguard server, establishes the tunnel and then my email and web are now going to the VM on the new home machine, or whereever in the world I want to bring that VM up. Yet, to any clients hitting my public IP (the cloud VPS), nothing has changed except for a few minutes downtime.