News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The moral case against equity language by mrguyorama on Friday March 03, 2023 @11:53AM (#35012048)
Nobody is saying you can't say the word brown FFS.
Re:The moral case against equity language by nasmorn on Friday March 03, 2023 @12:42PM (#35012744)
Exactly. Nobody is saying that but still it was removed from eg Roald Dahls books.
Re:The moral case against equity language by andrekandre on Saturday March 04, 2023 @06:38PM (#35025608)

  > it was removed from eg Roald Dahls books.
who removed it?
Re:The moral case against equity language by nasmorn on Sunday March 05, 2023 @04:18PM (#35034039)
The editors of the new editions most probably on command of the publisher
Re:The moral case against equity language by phpisthebest on Friday March 03, 2023 @12:20PM (#35012460)
There are entire documents in technology written to erase words

White / Black List -> Allow / Deny

Git "master" -> Main

and about 10,000 other examples.

Re:The moral case against equity language by mrguyorama on Friday March 03, 2023 @03:05PM (#35014336)
You can name a branch master on git to your hearts content. We still have branches named master. We still have stuff we refer to as "whitelist" even though that was never an accurate descriptor for it in the first place.

This shit isn't banned. Nobody stops you from using them.

Re:The moral case against equity language by phpisthebest on Friday March 03, 2023 @04:06PM (#35014977)
It would be unconstitutional in the US to ban it, the question or comment thread is not about being illegal to use the word..

The issue the social pressure against these terms, and the ever changing landscape one political segment of the population has in being forever offended by everything

Re:The moral case against equity language by strix_varius on Saturday March 04, 2023 @01:25AM (#35018704)
It's certainly not unconstitutional for organizations to ban words. It's happening every day at major tech companies.
Re:The moral case against equity language by phpisthebest on Saturday March 04, 2023 @07:44AM (#35020396)
This entire comment thread should be a master class in logical fallcies as every reply shifts the goal posts back and forth....

Which i suspect is the end goal as that way no one actually have to address the underlying issues of compelled / socially enforced speech and the ongoing attacks on free expression on top of the ever shrinking mental health of the population has society coddles people into believing everyone else has to manage an individuals mental health instead of having to harden your own mind and come to terms with the fact the life is rarely fair, kind, nor do people (nor should) about your "feelings"

Re:The moral case against equity language by JaimeThompson on Saturday March 04, 2023 @04:03PM (#35024475)
> one political segment of the population has in being forever offended by everything

Which segment is that?

Re:The moral case against equity language by cherrycherry98 on Friday March 03, 2023 @04:53PM (#35015569)
Companies now have "inclusive language" policies. There are dashboards that track team compliance and people that cheer this stuff on.

Master branch gets renamed to main meanwhile one can freely talk about how they used their MasterCard to buy a new Jazzmaster guitar that they keep in their master bedroom with a Master lock on it and they're almost done with the master of their new album showing off their mastery of musical and production that they learned taking lessons on MasterClass. Did I mention there's a cover of Master of Puppets?

Think this sounds crazy? Don't read this: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675987

Re:The moral case against equity language by phpisthebest on Friday March 03, 2023 @06:18PM (#35016323)
Looks like we know why Mozilla is falling behind, they are wasting limited dev time removing these things..

that is CRAZY!!~!!!

Re:The moral case against equity language by sam_goody on Sunday March 05, 2023 @04:28PM (#35034145)
You just made me sad :(

Or perhaps, temporarily happiness challenged.

Re:The moral case against equity language by lynx23 on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @12:55AM (#35065748)
Muahahaha, well said.
Re:The moral case against equity language by _gabe_ on Saturday March 04, 2023 @10:58PM (#35026799)
> This shit isn't banned. Nobody stops you from using them.

Speak for yourself. I had a PR rejected because I named a variable `blacklist` and was unaware that it's now considered a social faux pas. Of course, changing it to `blocklist` was simple enough, but wasted a couple hours because I had to ping the person again after finding out the PR was rejected, fixing it, retesting the code to make sure it didn't break stuff, pushing the changes, waiting for those tests to rerun, and then finally waiting for the person to re-review the code.