News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The moral case against equity language by Gareth321 on Friday March 03, 2023 @07:38AM (#35008756)
"What is a woman" is a perfectly reasonable question to ask a legislator who refuses to acknowledge that women exist. I certainly would never vote for someone who believes that women are defined as "whatever I feel right now." I'm disappointed you think it's the people demanding acknowledgement which should be labelled "theocratic fascists" rather than the misogynists refusing to acknowledge women exist.
Re:The moral case against equity language by asmor on Friday March 03, 2023 @08:54AM (#35009652)
I didn't label anyone a theocratic fascist. That's just Matt Walsh's twitter bio. Though radfems seem not too uncomfortable with Walsh, considering JKR praised the man for his "documentary" and received little backlash from her loyal following.
Re:The moral case against equity language by undersuit on Friday March 03, 2023 @01:57PM (#35013584)
Which legislator refused to acknowledge that women exist?