News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The moral case against equity language by RobotToaster on Friday March 03, 2023 @06:27AM (#35008197)
Ironically it's the opposite in the autism community, the white Knights insist it should be "autistic people" for some reason.

None of this is going to change anyone's material conditions, it's just a distraction invented by well paid "diversity consultants".

At least the fad for "differently abled" seems to have died.

Re:The moral case against equity language by regularfry on Friday March 03, 2023 @09:14AM (#35009875)
"People with autism" carries a connotation that the person and the autism are separable. Given the deep, dark, nasty history of autism "cures" that's a very raw nerve, and stamping out that type of thinking will materially improve conditions.
Re:The moral case against equity language by faeriechangling on Friday March 03, 2023 @06:07PM (#35016251)
Depends on if you’re talking to autistic people, or professionals who work with autistic people/their parents.

The latter group still tends to use “person with autism” and I think it’s more funny than anything but people get really pissed at people who developed this vocabulary without actually asking Autistic people what they thought of it.

I love the phrasing “person with autism” because it allows me to make a bunch of fairly accurate assumptions about the type of person you are, which is generally somebody who sees autism in a very paternalistic light. Why stigmatize the use of language where somebody self-identifies themselves as hostile to your interests and seeing themselves as being your woke saviour? What was that saying - don’t interrupt your enemy while they’re making a mistake?

Re:The moral case against equity language by lynx23 on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @01:07AM (#35065807)
Good point, weird constructed language can also be utilized as a filter to avoid hostile and/or paternalistic people. Weaponizing SJW language to fight bigots, I like it!