Re:The moral case against equity language
by regularfry on Friday March 03, 2023 @09:14AM
(#35009875)
"People with autism" carries a connotation that the person and the autism are separable. Given the deep, dark, nasty history of autism "cures" that's a very raw nerve, and stamping out that type of thinking will materially improve conditions.
Re:The moral case against equity language
by faeriechangling on Friday March 03, 2023 @06:07PM
(#35016251)
Depends on if you’re talking to autistic people, or professionals who work with autistic people/their parents.
The latter group still tends to use “person with autism” and I think it’s more funny than anything but people get really pissed at people who developed this vocabulary without actually asking Autistic people what they thought of it.
I love the phrasing “person with autism” because it allows me to make a bunch of fairly accurate assumptions about the type of person you are, which is generally somebody who sees autism in a very paternalistic light. Why stigmatize the use of language where somebody self-identifies themselves as hostile to your interests and seeing themselves as being your woke saviour? What was that saying - don’t interrupt your enemy while they’re making a mistake?
None of this is going to change anyone's material conditions, it's just a distraction invented by well paid "diversity consultants".
At least the fad for "differently abled" seems to have died.